WorldTour Power Rankings | Men’s & Women’s Pro Cycling Teams

WorldTour Power Rankings | Men’s & Women’s Pro Cycling Teams

WorldTour Power Rankings — February 2026

These February rankings reflect race outcomes from January 2026, weighted heavily toward WorldTour stage race GC and WorldTour one-day results. Movements reflect positions relative to the January rankings.

Women’s WorldTour Power Rankings

#1
EF Education–Oatly
▲10
The most valuable January result on the calendar.

Noemi Rüegg wins the Santos Women’s Tour Down Under overall (2.WWT), the highest-value race of the month. She also wins Stage 3 and finishes second in the TDU One Day (1.Pro). That combination — GC dominance plus one-day impact — makes this the strongest January performance in the peloton.

They rise from #12 in January to #1 in February because WorldTour GC sits at the top of the weighting hierarchy.

#2
UAE Team ADQ
▲1
Depth across the most important race of the month.

Second, third and fourth overall at the Tour Down Under delivers enormous WWT points volume. Add a top five at Cadel Evans and multiple Mallorca 1.1 wins and podiums, and UAE demonstrate breadth as well as GC strength.

They don’t take the biggest headline win — but they accumulate the most complete January outside EF.

#3
FDJ United – SUEZ
▼2
Major one-day statement, lighter GC impact.

Ally Wollaston wins Cadel Evans (1.WWT) and takes two Tour Down Under stages. That’s elite output. However, absence from the top GC positions at TDU means total WWT volume trails EF and UAE.

Still unquestionably top tier — just slightly edged on January structure.

#4
Team Picnic PostNL
▲7
WorldTour podium impact across multiple days.

Josie Nelson’s 2nd at Cadel Evans plus repeated TDU stage podiums mark a breakout month. They convert presence into real WWT points.

This isn’t hype — it’s sustained January scoring.

#5
Team SD Worx – Protime
▼3
Consistent, but without a defining January win.

Stage placings and a TDU One Day podium keep them relevant. But without a GC podium or WWT victory, they slide relative to teams that capitalised more decisively.

#6
Human Powered Health
▲1
1.Pro victory carries real weight.

Maggie Coles-Lyster wins the TDU One Day (1.Pro), and the team places 6th overall at TDU GC. Not dominant, but strong enough to rise.

#7
Liv AlUla Jayco
▲1
Quietly productive WWT month.

Fourth at Cadel Evans and 8th overall at TDU GC show genuine competitiveness. They move upward on structured consistency.

#8
AG Insurance – Soudal
▼2
Major podium, lighter depth.

Third at Cadel Evans is a premium result. Beyond that, January volume is thinner than teams above.

#9
Lidl – Trek
▼5
GC presence without podium conversion.

Seventh overall at TDU GC and consistent 1.1 results show stability. But absence of WWT podium pushes them down.

#10
Team Visma | Lease a Bike
Reliable but not explosive.

Fifth overall at TDU GC and sixth at Cadel Evans demonstrate competence, though not breakthrough performance.

#11
Movistar Team
▼2
1.1 success, limited WWT impact.

Trofeo Llucmajor win and Mallorca podiums are valuable, but January’s ranking is decided at WorldTour level.

#12
Uno-X Mobility
▲1
Incremental improvement.

Strong Mallorca presence keeps them competitive, though lacking WWT podiums.

#13
Canyon//SRAM Racing
▼8
Minimal January footprint.

No significant WWT podium or stage presence in the provided dataset. Relative drop reflects output, not reputation.

#14
Fenix–Premier Tech
Back-end GC presence.

Tenth overall at TDU GC gives some structure, but January remains light relative to peers.

Men’s WorldTour Power Rankings

#1
UAE Team Emirates – XRG
January belonged to them.

Winning the Santos Tour Down Under overall sets the tone for the entire month. Jay Vine’s GC victory carries the most weight of any result in January, and that alone keeps UAE at the top.

But they didn’t stop there. They also took control of the AlUla Tour, winning overall and placing another rider on the podium. Two stage-race GCs in one month — across different race categories — is structural strength, not luck. Until someone else matches that combination, they remain the benchmark.

#2
Decathlon CMA CGM
▲9
A breakout month at WorldTour level.

Winning Cadel Evans is a statement. Backing it up with repeated Tour Down Under stage podiums turns that statement into authority. Tobias Lund Andresen wasn’t just present — he dictated sprint finishes across the week.

This wasn’t a single spike performance. It was sustained WorldTour-level delivery across two races. That forces a major correction upward.

#3
Team Jayco AlUla
▲6
Tour Down Under GC power.

Second overall at Tour Down Under is one of the most valuable results available in January. When you combine that with a top ten GC finish and a top five at Cadel Evans, you have a team that performed where it mattered most.

They weren’t chasing stage scraps. They were riding for overall outcomes — and they delivered. That elevates them into the top tier for February.

#4
Team Visma | Lease a Bike
▼2
High quality, slightly lighter weight.

Second at Cadel Evans and a Tour Down Under stage win is an excellent January by any normal standard. Brennan was sharp, aggressive and decisive.

What holds them just outside the top three is simple comparison: the teams above delivered either a GC victory or a bigger overall stage-race outcome. Visma were very good. Others were marginally heavier in impact.

#5
Soudal Quick-Step
▼1
Depth at Tour Down Under.

Two riders inside the top eight overall at Tour Down Under is significant. That’s serious GC scoring in the most important race of the month.

They didn’t take a headline win, but they accumulated intelligently and consistently. That keeps them firmly inside the top five, even without fireworks.

#6
XDS Astana Team
Consistent across multiple races.

Second overall at AlUla plus a stage win shows strong early-season structure. Add repeated Tour Down Under stage presence and a Cadel Evans top ten, and this is one of the more complete January profiles.

They didn’t hit the absolute peak, but they didn’t miss anywhere either. That stability holds them in place.

#7
NSN Cycling Team
▲9
WorldTour impact, not just participation.

Third at Cadel Evans and a Tour Down Under stage win is a serious January. Add multiple top-five finishes across Adelaide and you see a team punching above expectation.

This isn’t development anymore — it’s delivery. The jump reflects actual race influence.

#8
Uno-X Mobility
▲5
GC-focused execution.

Fifth and seventh overall at Tour Down Under is a powerful January return. They didn’t win stages, but they rode for general classification and secured major points.

When GC is weighted highest, that outcome matters more than scattered stage placings.

#9
INEOS Grenadiers
▼5
One bright spark.

A Tour Down Under stage win keeps them relevant. It shows finishing speed and race sharpness.

But without a GC result or a major one-day impact, they lose ground to teams that converted January into heavier outcomes.

#10
Lidl–Trek
▼7
Pro-level dominance, lighter UWT influence.

Two stage wins at AlUla underline sprint strength. That matters.

But the biggest January currency sits at WorldTour level, and their influence there was limited. That’s the difference.

#11
EF Education–EasyPost
▲3
A GC podium carries real weight.

Third overall at Tour Down Under is enough to lift the entire month. That’s a result that reshapes rankings on its own.

They didn’t flood the calendar — they didn’t need to. One major GC podium is significant currency in January.

#12
Bahrain Victorious
Solid, but not decisive.

A top five overall at AlUla and consistent sprint placings show a team working well.

However, the absence of a defining WorldTour moment keeps them static.

#13
Alpecin–Premier Tech
▼6
Depth without a peak.

Two riders inside the top ten at Cadel Evans reflects competitiveness.

But January was shaped by wins and GC podiums. Without those, they slide.

#14
Movistar Team
▼4
One strong result, limited support.

Fifth at Cadel Evans shows they can perform at WorldTour level.

Beyond that, January lacked the volume or GC weight to hold position.

#15
Team Picnic PostNL
▲2
Pro-level contribution keeps them afloat.

A top ten at AlUla and a stage podium provide tangible January output.

It’s incremental — but it’s real enough to climb slightly.

#16
Groupama–FDJ United
▼8
Too thin for January.

A single stage podium isn’t enough when others are stacking GC and one-day points.

They need a heavier February to rebound.

#17
Lotto Intermarché
▼2
Minor placings only.

January shows presence, but not impact. In a competitive opening month, that’s not enough to move upward.

#18
Cofidis
Lightest January footprint.

A Pro-level stage podium shows capability, but without WorldTour influence they remain at the bottom of this month’s rankings.

Back to blog

Leave a comment